}

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Agencies Should Charge Their Clients Overtime



Last week I wrote about the absurdity of the hours ad agency employees work.  This post is an addendum.

Ad agencies charge their clients what is called a “blended rate”  (This is the combined average salary of everyone working on an account.)  It includes the salaries of administrative help, back office people, account managers, planners and strategic people and all levels of creative executives as well as management.  From my conversations with people in the know, this rate actually may cause agencies to lose money, since, ultimately, clients dictate the amount they are willing to pay; if senior people spend more time than estimated or agreed, clients do not pay accordingly.  Agencies accept the blended rate, even at a loss, because they are desperate for new business, especially the network-owned ad agencies. Under this system of compensation, there is always another agency that is willing to accept lower pay.

If a significant number of ad agency executives are working long hours on a constant basis, they should be paid overtime and/or given a bonus and their clients should be charged accordingly.  When I was discussing this concept with a senior executive, he reminded me that most executives are considered “exempt”.  Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), exempt employees are not entitled to overtime.  However, in reading the law, a company may pay exempt employees overtime or bonuses, at their discretion. 

If collected, this money should be passed on to employees who work long hours, either in the form of frequent bonuses or as pure overtime pay.

If ad agencies did this several things would happen.  Most important, clients would insist that their agency people work fewer hours so that they pay less to the agency. Paying overtime to agencies would result in happier employees and might reduce turnover significantly. In last week’s post, I told the story of one creative director who resigned over her long hours.  If agencies and their clients paid overtime and limited the amount of time that people had to work, it might attract more talented employees.  Which means that It might generate better work (contrary to some popular belief, when people are tired, they cannot do their best work). 

When I wrote this post last week, I received many comments from people who had left the advertising business for exactly this reason.  Long hours and low pay are not compatible.  I know that paying overtime or consistent bonuses for long work is only a pipe dream, but I wish it would happen.

When agencies were paid by commissions, profit margins were higher so agencies could afford to take care of employees who worked long and hard.  Not so much anymore.  Pity. 

9 comments:

  1. Your inference that network-owned agencies are desperate for business is interesting. It suggests consolidation lowers prices. I’m no economist, but isn’t consolidation supposed to raise prices?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not sure pricing has anything to do with it. Part of the pitch is always staffing and pricing. The problem is that the networks demand a predetermined profit from their agencies. The result is that agencies are squeezed from both sides - by clients who want them to work for less and less money and from their owners who demand higher contributions. Everything suffers as a result, including proper staffing.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for Sharing such imported information with us. I hope you will share some more info about Agencies Should Charge Their Clients Overtime. please keep sharing!


    Creative Advertising Agency

    ReplyDelete
  3. Amen! As a Senior VP at a NYC agency, there were many nights before creative presentations that myself and the entire team would be at the office until after 1 am. It was exhausting, and we certainly didn't do our best work.

    The only "compensation" we got was dinner delivered paid for by the agency, and then car service home (I wasn't allowing people to take mass transit after midnight!).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agencies need to find ways of thanking and rewarding employees who are doing their best for them

      Delete
  4. What I read here is there’s more money in being a landlord than a retailer. The holding companies take what they want from their divisions and brands; to satisfy themselves; to satisfy investors. Meanwhile, the divisions and brands compete for clients on price. Sounds like a suckers game. Those Saatchi guys were smarter than I thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob, that is a very articulate explanation of the situation. Thanks.

      Delete

I would welcome your comments, suggestions or anything you would like to share with me or my readers.

 
Creative Commons License
.