Once upon a time in the world, people could count on working for a
company for many years. Not so any more.
These days, most ad agencies only hire for specific accounts. If those businesses leave, chances are very
good that employees working on them will be terminated rather than rotated on
to another business, no matter how good a job they are doing.
Several years ago, I wrote about HR
telling me that it took too much time and trouble to rotate executives on to
other accounts and that it is easier to let them go instead. I wonder if the executives who are running
most of the big agencies today, especially those who have been at them for many
years, could actually still be in place if the policies of today were in effect
years ago; surely almost all of them at some point in their career worked on an
account which fired their agency. This
is not just a problem with ad agencies, because the lack of loyalty permeates
business as well as our entire society.
It is almost as if business is giving the entire population a message
telling people that allegiance to those who have done a good job is really
unnecessary.
Looking back on a thirty plus career in recruiting, I see the lack of
loyalty constantly. I certainly do not
expect a young account executive who I placed twenty years ago to be faithful
and thankful to me for placing them in an early job. However, I am constantly surprised by senior
executives – department heads, EVPs, presidents and chairmen – who I have
recently placed, who then never really thank me for getting them a great job
or, in turn, give me the assignment(s) to help them staff.
Their excuse is often that they cannot tell human resources who to use
as a recruiter. I understand that, but
how about an introduction to the people responsible for hiring? It is a subtle way of handling the problem.
It isn’t just me and it isn’t just about recruiting. I can think of a senior financial person at
an Omnicom agency who was actually semi-retired from one of their agencies, but
still a consultant for them. He gave me an
assignment to find a president for one of their agencies. He did the initial interviewing and, together
with me, helped the final candidate through the process of interviewing with
senior Omnicom executives. He provided the candidate with invaluable inside
information and then helped the candidate negotiate his job. He spoke to the
candidate almost every day during the long hiring process, which lasted over
five months. After the president was hired, this particular candidate, in over
ten years now, did not give me a single assignment.
And worse, he did not return the calls from the Omnicom consultant. His agency had huge financial problems which
the consultant could have helped him resolve, but he never even returned his
calls. It was beyond rude, but, sadly, not uncommon.
I am not complaining; I accept all this as part of business and life in
general. People ask me for advice (I have
helped hundreds of executives negotiate their jobs, or counseled them, even if
I am not their recruiter. I never charge
for this advice because it is something I like to do – as do many recruiters –
but once these executives are hired, I never hear from them again – sometimes not even to
tell me that they got the job.)
Beyond that, as every recruiter knows, there are people I have placed in jobs which have actually made their careers and they, too, never call again. It acceptable but strange.
Beyond that, as every recruiter knows, there are people I have placed in jobs which have actually made their careers and they, too, never call again. It acceptable but strange.
And the truth is, I think this behavior is tacitly accepted because of
the way in which companies do business. They
have made disloyalty and ungratefulness permissible.
LOYALTY in business? What’s that? Been so long, I had to look it up in the dictionary. Truth is … If you want loyalty and gratitude, get a dog!
ReplyDelete