Every ad agency faces the
same client problem: getting good work
approved by the various client layers without the work being watered down by
each successive layer of approval. By
the time it gets to the most senior person, the work often does not even
slightly resemble what was originally created.
The best clients
sometimes ask the agency to bring the original and subsequent “boards” to the
final presentation. (Boards here are intended to be generic – could be TV,
radio, magazines, out-of-home, even web design and UX.) These clients are rare. During my many years as an account person, I
only had one client do this. The final
board was always presented first, the first board was presented last with an
explanation of the changes that were made by his brand and advertising
people. The result is that he often
vented his wrath at the changes. As a
result, changes were kept to a minimum by the fear of his anger. There had to be a good reason for the changes.
These clients are few and
far between. I believe that this why
there is so much bad work; by the time the work gets to the final approval
level it has often become the “Emperor’s New Clothes”. I always think of the old adage that a camel
is a horse designed by a committee.
That is a long
explanation to get to a short and funny story.
Two people, cousins and
partners, owned a company equally; they were the children of the original
founders of the company. The company was Faygo Beverages, a Detroit based soft
drink company (subsequently sold, many years after this story). Mort and Phil Feigenson were legendary
tyrants. They sat together in the same office.
They approved everything that happened in their company. But they especially loved the
advertising. One of them had really
great taste, one not so good. The agency
always presented directly to them along with their ad manager, who didn’t have
much to say because the owners always had the last and, mostly, only word. The
company was known for having good, sometimes great advertising. But occasionally they erred.
I was newly on the
account and this was my first presentation to them. I was presenting fairly mundane but nice coupon
ads. One of the owners asked if the
headline on one ad could be put with the copy of the other. Without thinking much, I responded simply, “No”. I don’t think anyone ever told them no
before. The room became deathly
silent. They stared at me and I stared
back. You could cut the silence in the room.
The quiet lasted, probably, twenty seconds. Then, the copy group head, who was sitting
behind me, said, and this is an exact quote - “A Paul has come over the room.”
It broke the silence and was was the greatest
business pun I ever heard.
Everyone, including the
cousins laughed. They approved the ads as
presented and insisted that no presentation ever be made again without me. They loved the fact that I stood up to them. For the next several years, they really
listened to me. We were able to sell
them really good work.
Love it.
ReplyDeleteGreat story!
ReplyDeleteApropos to this column about creative, just thought I’d share this commentary that I posted today at Ad Age on the subject. Because advertising, however messy, is a very deliberative process, not a “crapshoot” on-the-fly ,,, “I never want to see an agency’s Creative Department “blown up”, as author Ed Chambliss suggests, because it is the “gold mine” of every agency. Yes, there are layers and differing opinions within the “Creative family”, but that’s good. Peer review among creative peers (hopefully). And then, after they have digested and reflected the upfront Brand research and guidance provided to them earlier by agency “outsiders”, their final work product is held to higher scrutiny by ALL concerned. And that’s not only good … it’s absolutely necessary! Because when millions of advertiser dollars are at stake, it’s good to have an internal agency “murder board” before presenting to the client. That is … Better to deal with internal questions or objections before hearing the client say, “NO.” Whereupon, you’re back to the drawing board, so to speak, and losing money by the hour. Or, as they say in the military, paying for the same real estate twice.” http://adage.com/article/agency-viewpoint/devil-department/311091/
ReplyDelete