The one thing that I hear from every agency person who has
gone to the corporate side is that they finally understand what clients do, how
they spend their time and the priorities that take them away from agencies. And
they all also say that their client side experience puts the issues that agency
people have into complete perspective. (I actually hear the same thing from
clients who go to agencies – before joining an agency they had no idea how
complicated the relationship is).
As I have previously written, agencies don’t like to hire
clients (and vice versa). It
is a terrible mistake because every agency could use the perspective which
client-side experience can bring.
There are many consultants and consulting companies who
have made a fine living by lecturing senior agency management on the issue of agency-client
relations and how to get along better, but they never seem to actually resolve
the problem. The reason they cannot
solve this issue is because disliking and distrust of clients are endemic to the
business on both sides.
Clients resent agencies pushing for their work; clients
don’t think agencies understand their business.
Clients think their agencies are too expensive, especially when it comes to
production. But there are other areas as well.
Agencies can’t understand why they don’t get better direction; agencies
aren’t allowed to know their clients’ business. Corporate procurement has
squeezed agencies to the point where the relationship is constantly strained
and account people are merely suppliers, not partners.
A lot of the enmity is internally generated on both sides
of the business. Dealing with each other
can be frustrating. Nevertheless, I put
responsibility for handling this squarely in the hands of account people. Good
account people should learn enough about their clients to not only know about
the client’s business, but to understand the ins and outs of the client’s
culture in order to put their business in perspective and explain to their
agencies what has happened and why it occurred.
This means that account people need to be well enough trained nd familiar enough with their clients to
know what will sell and not sell; by no means should any account person prevent
good, on-strategy creative from being presented. And once bought by the client,
their job is to keep it sold.
Their job is to keep creative, media and planners enthusiastic and excited.
Their job is to keep creative, media and planners enthusiastic and excited.
When I was a senior account person, I would not allow the
account people to badmouth their clients to others in the agency. I told them
that they could come in to my office and bitch and moan to me all they wanted,
but when they discussed their client issues with others in the agency they only
succeed in destroying enthusiasm for working on the account. Some account people mistakenly believe that
by speaking ill of their clients that they will strengthen and build their
relationships with others in the agency – especially creative people. Unfortunately, the opposite is true.
In today’s environment, agencies do not spend enough time
at the client. When ad agencies don’t
spend enough social and getting-to-know-you time with their clients, they cannot
learn the subtleties and nuances of their client’s jobs and their
businesses. Clients are partially to
blame for this issue because their procurement people have cut agency
compensation to the bone which discourages this kind of quality time.
Nevertheless, learning the client’s business is the essential job of account
people so that information can be translated back to the rest of the agency.
Of course, there are some bad clients, but the only way
that agencies can handle them is by trying to understand what makes them bad
and attempting to deal with the issues in a positive way. Mostly, I found that bad clients are clients
agencies don’t spend enough time with.
Even good clients occasionally need to be hand-held. It is part of the job.
I started my agency career many years ago at Ted Bates Worldwide, and in the two years that I was there before moving on to SSC&B:Lintas, I only met our Chairman, Bob Jacoby, once. But I remember in the course of our very brief conversation using the term “client service”, whereupon he immediately said to me, “If you want to be in ‘Client Services’, go work for DDB. At Bates we only have ‘ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT’ “. Which I later learned meant, he held every account person, at every level, directly responsible for the state of their client relations and client business. But then, you couldn’t even get into Bates without some proven knowledge of Brand Marketing AND Advertising in the first place. And that is the problem facing agencies today. Because that standard has been replaced by digital this and social that, irrespective of whether one knows anything about the “4 Ps”. More like hiring well-educated counter clerks from Burger King, a la, “Have It Your Way.”
ReplyDeleteAll of which is to say to what I think is Paul’s point … Of course “social time” with the client is critical … but you’d better know your marketing “stuff” when opening your mouth. And if you’re not Leading (and Managing); then you’re just following and “Servicing”.
That said and ironically, Bates is long-gone to the agency dustbin and DDB is still standing. And so much for what I think.
Well, Bill, there is a difference between managing and servicing. Good point. My concern is an has been that agency account managers must be responsible and given the tools with which to truly manage their accounts. Which means both anticipating and handling problems.
ReplyDeleteWell Paulie … I’m obviously “busted”, and so much for my anonymity. You know me too well. I guess the real point of my post (and many others elsewhere) is that today’s younger agency people don’t really know or understand what Brand Marketing is. They come to the business with impressive college degrees in English Literature, Art History, Sociology, whatever, but very little knowledge about what we actually do in marketing or the agency biz – which is to sell stuff. However glorified or mundane it might seem, that’s the job. If only they would watch this landmark and very contemporary video address from the “Godfather” of brand marketing, Philip Kotler, they might “get it” and be more inspired. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR-qL7QdVZQ. But it’s one-hour and most can’t sit still for that long. On to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, Yelp, whatever. Digital ADD and all that. Bill
DeleteAfter starting my career with five years in media I moved into account work and learned what a tough job it is! I used to joke that everyone hated the AE; creatives thought we were just empty suits (we wore suits back then) with no artistic vision, media planners thought we dumped client requests on them and had no knowledge about their practice (I had an edge there), and brand managers would just beat us up over estimates! Ha! But it was a great experience for me and expanded my knowledge beyond "media" to "advertising," more in tune with the actual marketing and selling of products.
ReplyDeleteThe point of my post had nothing to do with Brand Marketing. It was about what good account management is. Phil Kotler is a friend of mine (he and his wife, Nancy, are fellow glass collectors). I have seen this presentation and, like most things he does, it awesome and worth watching.
ReplyDeleteI certainly got your point, as I generally do, whether you realize it or not. In this particular instance yours was “… Agency account managers must be given the responsibility and tools with which to manage their accounts.” Got it! But if you don’t have the knowledge to know which tool to use in any given situation or, even then, how to use it, all the responsibility and authority in the world won’t make a wit of difference for the good..
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTim, I am not sure why you removed your comment and the link to your AdWeek article. I fully agree with you.
Delete