}

Monday, December 12, 2011

How to Make Sure the Person You Hire is the Person You Interviewed


I have wanted to write this for a long time.  Everyone hires someone at one point or another.  How many of you have made bad hires?  The answer should be that we have all done it.  We have all hired someone and once they started work, we discovered all the flaws in their abilities and personality. And then we second guessed ourselves on how it could have happened.

One reason this happens because jobs are not specified correctly.  Most job specs I receive are pap. They are a wish list of personality attributes which have very little to do with the actual job that needs to be accomplished.  Job specs must spell out the truth about the job, pluses and minuses, the personality of the person you want to hire and it must detail the issues to be handled and resolved.  This is true of very senior people as well as account executives.

But that aside, there are things which can be done during the interview process to insure the success of candidates once they are hired.  Most interviews last between half an hour and an hour.  That is obviously not enough time to determine all you need to know about the person you are seeing.  It is probably enough time to determine if someone’s personality is a fit, but not necessarily their skill set.  However, assuming that they will meet with three or four other people, that works out to be three to four or five hours of total interviewing time. If played right, that should be enough time to make a proper determination of their fit and qualifications. 

Each person in the process should have a specific function. The hiring manager, who is generally the first person to interview, should do general screening – interests, experiences, preliminary abilities to do the job.  Subsequent people should be a double-check.

Most interviews take the résumé for granted.  If someone is looking for a package goods account director and you are interviewing someone who was trained at a major agency, worked on J&J, P&G and Lever, it is very easy to accept that their skills are appropriate.  But are they?  It is critical to determine what their roles were vs. what their supervisors (and even subordinates) did.  It is important to explore candidate's motivations, interests, ambitions and management styles.

Everyone in the interviewing process should have agreed to the job specs and be totally familiar with them. Assuming that multiple people will meet this candidate, with each successive interview, it is essential for the group to sit together and actually discuss the candidate.  This is rarely done.  What I know happens, is that the first interviewer says to HR or the second person to be scheduled, “I saw someone I liked who you should meet”.  That is often the end of the discussion. A meeting among those in the interview cycle is an important component so that the pros and cons of the candidate can be discussed and an agenda for the next interview agreed upon to determine things that need to be covered or double checked. If this is followed, many flaws will be uncovered.  And if a candidate is “iffy”, both positives and negatives will emerge.

All too often, after the first interview, which is generally with the hiring manager, the subsequent interviews become merely a personality check.  This leads to poor hires.

It is essential to determine if the candidate has the actual skill set that is necessary (that is where job specs come in) for success.  In one famous case, a potential head of an agency was interviewed by a number of senior holding company executives, but they failed to determine if the candidate was capable of solving the agency’s issues (maybe they didn’t know, but if so, shame on them). 

All too often the hiring manager finds a candidate he or she likes and the subsequent interviews are simply a rubber stamp, but the other people in the process know that the hiring manger has a specific management style which needs to be screened for.  If a supervisor is difficult or needs a person who is a counter-balance, those attributes need to be spelled out in the job specs.  I can think of another case where a newly-wed who loved to travel was hired.  She was not told the account was in production virtually all month, every month.  After six weeks on the road she resigned because she had only been home three nights.

If someone leaves a job quickly, the original job specs have to be reexamined. An honest exit interview is essential to determine if there were issues which need to be covered in a revised job specification.   All too many executives don’t know how to write an actionable and realistic job specification.  I always say that if a candidate is rejected (or accepted ) for a reason that is not in the job spec, the job spec is incomplete and must be rewritten.

Too often I hear of someone failing in a job because neither the candidate nor the company defined the expectations clearly.


17 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi! I'm at work surfing around your blog from my new apple iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the fantastic work!
    My weblog :: internet casino Usa

    ReplyDelete
  8. I leave a response whenever I like a article on a site or if I have something to add to the discussion.
    It is a result of the passion displayed in the post I looked at.
    And on this post "How to Make Sure the Person You Hire is the Person You Interviewed".
    I was actually excited enough to post a commenta response :
    -) I actually do have a couple of questions for you if you
    do not mind. Is it simply me or does it seem like a few of the remarks look like they are written by brain dead individuals?

    :-P And, if you are writing on other online social sites,
    I'd like to keep up with you. Could you list the complete urls of your community sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?
    Visit my web site :: real online money

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I
    stumbleupon everyday. It will always be interesting to read through articles
    from other authors and practice something from their websites.
    Here is my blog post ; Geld Verdienen Online SeriöS

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am extremely inspired with your writing abilities
    and also with the structure to your weblog. Is that this a
    paid subject matter or did you customize it your self?
    Anyway keep up the excellent high quality writing,
    it's uncommon to look a nice blog like this one nowadays..
    Visit my web blog ... slot machine games online

    ReplyDelete
  11. Asking questions are actually fastidious thing if you are not understanding
    anything totally, but this paragraph gives good understanding even.
    Take a look at my site : internet casino usa

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pretty great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and
    wished to say that I have really enjoyed surfing around your
    weblog posts. After all I'll be subscribing for your rss feed and I hope you write once more very soon!
    Here is my blog ... online slot machines

    ReplyDelete
  13. Have you ever thought about creating an e-book or guest authoring on other sites?

    I have a blog centered on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information.
    I know my audience would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me
    an e mail.
    Also visit my web-site ; legit free work from home jobs

    ReplyDelete
  14. You really make it appear really easy with your
    presentation however I find this topic to be really one thing which I
    believe I'd never understand. It seems too complex and very vast for me. I am taking a look forward to your next publish, I'll try to get the cling of it!
    Feel free to surf my weblog play online roulette for real money

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's going to be end of mine day, except before end I am reading this wonderful paragraph to increase my experience.
    Look at my blog : best online casino usa

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's going to be end of mine day, except before end I am reading this wonderful paragraph to increase my experience.
    My website: best online casino usa

    ReplyDelete
  17. At this moment I am going to do my breakfast, once
    having my breakfast coming yet again to read other news.
    Also visit my blog ; wicked winnings slot machine

    ReplyDelete

I would welcome your comments, suggestions or anything you would like to share with me or my readers.

 
Creative Commons License
.